Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
BOSTON � A recent Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling that parents have a right to counsel in juvenile court cases concerning the child in need of services (CHINS) law when custody is at stake will boost the demand for lawyers to work on the cases. The CHINS law, which was enacted in 1973 as an effort to decriminalize truancy, allows a parent, guardian, a police officer, or certain school officials to ask the Juvenile Court to determine that a child with certain behaviors needs services, which are usually provided by the Massachusetts Department of Social Services. The CHINS law covers children under the age of 17 who repeatedly run away, are truant or do not obey parents or guardians. In his ruling about the issue of first impression Associate Justice Roderick L. Ireland reversed a county juvenile court decision that denied an indigent mother’s request for court-appointed counsel in a CHINS case where the judge was mulling whether to give the Massachusetts Department of Social Services custody of the child. Ireland’s decision also discussed similar decision in another county, even though the case became moot when the court dismissed the CHINS petition. In the Matter of HILARY (and a consolidated case) No. SJC-10036 (Mass.) “It is in keeping with the legislative intent to provide appointed counsel at the dispositional stage of CHINS proceedings if the judge is considering awarding custody to the department,” Ireland wrote. The decision means a “whole new class of people” will have party status in CHINS cases and entitled to court-appointed counsel or the right to have their private attorneys heard, said family law attorney Claudia Leis Bolgen of Woburn, Mass.-based Bolgen & Bolgen, who represented a plaintiff in the case. The court impounded the name of Bolgen’s client, who was one of the mothers in one of the lower court cases. “There will be a greater need for lawyers to involves themselves in CHINS.” Bolgen also said she doesn’t remember the last time the right to counsel has been expanded in Massachusetts. “There’s now a recognition that parents in these sorts of cases have legal interests at stake,” Bolgen said. In a statement, Massachusetts Department of Social Services spokesman Richard Nangle said the CHINS system should be “transformed” to allows families “to access in-home and out-of-home behavioral health services without giving up custody” of a child. Nagle also said the agency is hopeful that pending state legislation “will eliminate the need for DSS to gain custody of a child before a parent receives needed services.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.