CLOSEClose Law.com Menu
 
X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Attorneys representing thousands of Gulf Coast hurricane evacuees suing manufacturers of trailers alleged to have unhealthy levels of formaldehyde claim that crucial evidence is being lost every time the Federal Emergency Management Agency reclaims one of the trailers without allowing it to be tested for the presence of the toxic substance. Tony Buzbee of the Buzbee Law Firm in Galveston, Texas, alleges that FEMA � which purchased up to 145,000 of the trailers � has stonewalled requests for documents, denied access to trailers for formaldehyde testing and destroys evidence of formaldehyde contamination when it “deactivates” trailers after occupants leave for permanent housing. In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation, No. MDL-1873 (E.D. La.). Evidence lost? Buzbee’s firm is one of seven firms on the plaintiff steering committee for a mass action consolidating thousands of individual suits. “I don’t want to say they are purposely destroying evidence, but the practical matter is evidence is being lost and it is a function of [FEMA's] process,” Buzbee said. “If you have clients who were in a trailer, they often don’t know the [vehicle identification number], they don’t know what trailer they were in,” he added. “FEMA maintains that list but won’t give us that list. The client’s trailer may very well have been deactivated and the evidence is now gone.” FEMA spokeswoman Mary Margaret Walker said the agency spent more than $2 billion purchasing trailers for 143,000 households left homeless after Hurricane Katrina. Approximately 40,000 trailers are still occupied by evacuees more than two years after the storm, according to FEMA. When families move out of the trailers, the units are cleaned and repaired before being returned to storage, Walker said. She declined to comment on the allegation that the process destroys evidence sought by plaintiffs, citing the potential for litigation. FEMA’s handling of the formaldehyde allegations has been criticized by two congressional committees. Trailer occupants, testifying before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform last July, said FEMA ignored their complaints of nosebleeds, watery eyes, respiratory problems and flu-like symptoms associated with breathing formaldehyde fumes. The committee released more than 5,000 pages of FEMA documents, including an e-mail from the agency’s Office of General Counsel denying field requests for testing because “should they indicate some problem, the clock is running on our duty to respond.” On Jan. 28, the House Committee on Science and Technology, in a letter to Michael Chertoff, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, which includes FEMA, said that the agency “ignored, hid and manipulated government research on the potential impact of long-term exposure to formaldehyde.” FEMA denied the allegation in a press release the following day. Andrew Weinstock of Duplass, Zwain, Bourgeois, Morton, Pfister & Weinstock, in Metairie, La., liaison for the defense steering committee, declined to comment until he could consult with the other defense attorneys and their clients. The trailer manufacturers named as defendants are Fleetwood Enterprises Inc., Fleetwood Canada Ltd., Gulf Stream Coach Inc., Jayco Enterprises Inc., Pilgrim International Inc., Starcraft RV Inc., and Thor Industries Inc. Random sample needed Buzbee and other plaintiffs’ attorneys have tested for formaldehyde in the trailers occupied by their clients, but FEMA has blocked access to both a random sample of trailers and some that were never occupied, which plaintiffs’ counsel need to establish the statistical model to prove their case, Buzbee said. The plaintiffs have filed administrative claims with FEMA in recent weeks. The claimants can file suit in six months if the agency does not settle the claim. “Anybody will tell you suing the U.S. government is a very difficult proposition,” Buzbee said. “We don’t understand why FEMA won’t just admit a mistake, try to figure out why the manufacturers sold the government these trailers rife with formaldehyde and work with us to get remedy for these people,” he added. “They are still fighting us tooth and nail.” By March 18, the seven firms will file in the district court a master complaint consolidating thousands of claims.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.