Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
BOSTON �— A Massachusetts Superior Court judge denied the motion to dismiss a manslaughter indictment in the Big Dig-related case against epoxy distributor Powers Fasteners. Prosecutors blamed the Brewster, N.Y.-based company for the use of an unsuitable type of epoxy in Boston’s Central Artery, or Big Dig project. Officials have said inadequate epoxy caused the July 2006 tunnel ceiling collapse that killed 38-year-old Milena Del Valle. In a Dec. 12 decision that was released on Dec. 18, Superior Court Justice Patrick F. Brady ruled that a prosecutor is not barred from bringing a civil and criminal case with the same facts if the client is the public. Commonwealth v. Powers Fasteners Inc., No. SUCR2007-10802 (Suffolk Co., Mass., Super. Ct.) “When the Attorney General represents the Commonwealth in parallel criminal and civil cases, she represents the same public interest in both, without the dangers that come with concurrent representation of a private party,” wrote Brady. Powers tried to dismiss the case and have Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley disqualified for conflict of interest. Coakley is also running a civil case against Big Dig contractors for project cost overruns. Commonwealth v. Bechtel Corp., No. SUCV2006-4933 (Suffolk Co., Mass., Super. Ct.) “We believe Judge Brady’s decision accurately reflects the state of the law in Massachusetts relative to the authority of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth,” said Coakley, in a statement. Defense attorney Max Stern of Boston’s Stern Shapiro Weissberg & Garin, said he believes the decision is wrong. “There’s a serious risk that the criminal defendant will not have disinterested decision making to which it is entitled,” Stern said. Stern also said his team believes an appellate court would say a criminal defendant is “entitled to a prosecutor who is not burdened by financial interests, public or private.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.