Defense attorneys hoping for more control over how wage-and-hour class actions are handled at trial will have to look beyond Tuesday’s proceedings in an Alameda County, Calif., suit brought by employees of U.S. Bank.

When wage-and-hour class actions go to trial, defense lawyers often focus their case against individual plaintiffs as opposed to presenting a class-wide defense. But, in suits like the $172 million meal and rest break class action against Wal-Mart in 2005, and the overtime case against U.S. Bank now, this defense strategy has fallen flat as courts have devised trial plans that keep class actions more manageable.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]