Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Though the court does not decide whether use of the two-way closed-circuit television or the Texas court's administration of an oath to a prosecution witness in Ohio actually violated the appellant's confrontation rights, the Court of Criminal Appeals' conclusion that these procedures did not violate appellant's Sixth Amendment rights was not contrary to and did not constitute an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by the U.S. Supreme Court.
December 03, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS