Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn’t sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court.
Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm’s former lawyers.
Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn't sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court. Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm's former lawyers. The idea got a cool reception Wednesday during oral arguments in a case that saw nine major law firms and two large county bar associations filing briefs as amici curiae to oppose the concept. California appellate courts are split on the issue.
September 06, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn’t sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court.
Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm’s former lawyers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS