Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
When Alan Morrison left Washington, D.C., for the left-coast pace of Stanford Law School in 2004, he saw little prospect of adding to the 16 cases he had argued before the Supreme Court during his career at the Ralph Nader-created Public Citizen Litigation Group. Even this summer, when Morrison decided to return to the District as a special counsel to D.C. Attorney General Linda Singer, he thought he’d be working on local legal problems, not strategizing litigation before the high court. But last week, Singer confirmed that if the Supreme Court grants review in the city’s defense of its 31-year-old handgun ban, Morrison will argue the case for the city. “He’s taken that trip a few times,” Singer says. Morrison insists, “It’s not something I had on my radar screen” when he decided to come back to the District. With Morrison and D.C. Solicitor General Todd Kim on the inside, Singer’s team has a couple of outside Supreme Court veterans assisting: Akin, Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld’s Thomas Goldstein and O’Melveny & Myers’ Walter Dellinger, the former acting U.S. solicitor general, are helping on a pro bono basis, Singer says. “They are among the top Supreme Court advocates in the country,” says Singer, adding that “our [in-house] team has taken the laboring oar.” The city filed its petition Sept. 4 in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, asking the high court to overturn the March decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit striking down the city’s handgun ban on Second Amendment grounds. The ruling, written by conservative Senior Judge Laurence Silberman, “wears the trappings of a bona fide legal theory, but it distorts both the words of the amendment and the plain intent of the Founders,” according to the petition. The city offers arguments aimed at making it palatable for the Court’s conservatives to uphold the ban, noting, for example, that the city allows possession of rifles and shotguns. It also makes a federalism argument, asserting that the Second Amendment targets only federal interference with state militias � and therefore has no effect on the D.C. ban. Singer calls the city’s arguments “very textual” ones that would appeal to any justice who wants to honor the words of the Second Amendment. She sounds confident that victory is within reach: “If we didn’t think we could win, we would not have taken it up.”
Tony Mauro can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.