X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Judge Brieant http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=85357 PLAINTIFF’S HUSBAND began smoking defendant’s Marlboro cigarettes in 1961, and claimed to have become addicted in 1964. He died of lung cancer, in 2006, at 57. In 1997, New York sued the tobacco industry, under a parens patriae theory, as a predicate to its participation in the 1998 nationwide settlement. Despite ruling that plaintiff could proceed on claims of inadequate warning and fraudulent concealment extending to 1964, the court held that New York’s participation in the 1998 settlement between 46 states and the tobacco industry barred, as res judicata, subsequent claims for punitive damages in smoker’s damage actions in New York. The court found that plaintiff and her now-deceased husband and defendant tobacco company were “in privity” with the parties to the earlier action. The court also rejected plaintiff’s defective-design claims, noting that the “reduced carcinogen” and “non-addictive” cigarettes cited as safer alternatives by plaintiff’s expert were “indisputably rejected by consumers.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.