Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The D.C. Bar Counsel is recommending that former federal prosecutor G. Paul Howes be suspended for at least two years from practicing law in the District for his misconduct in a witness payment scandal. Howes also should “furnish proof of rehabilitation as a condition of reinstatement,” stated the 116-page brief filed on June 25. A Board on Professional Responsibility hearing committee hasn’t yet issued its recommended sanctions after hearing testimony in May from Howes and other witnesses. Howes — an assistant U.S. attorney in the District in the 1990s — testified that poor training, a heavy caseload, and a desire to help people in need led him to approve improper witness payment vouchers. Howes had admitted six of the eight ethics charges before the May hearing, including making false statements in court and engaging in conduct involving “dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” But he is challenging charges that he engaged in criminal conduct and offered unlawful inducements to witnesses. Both Bar Counsel and a Justice Department probe found Howes disbursed more than $140,000 in witness vouchers to 132 people during the Newton Street gang trial and another murder trial, including improper payments to incarcerated witnesses, friends and family of witnesses, and retired detectives. Howes hasn’t yet filed a response to the Bar Counsel brief, and neither he nor his attorney Plato Cacheris could be reached for comment last week. Howes, who is now a partner in the San Diego office of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, still could face disbarment because the D.C. Court of Appeals determines any sanctions. D.C. Bar Counsel Wallace “Gene” Shipp Jr. says his office does “very very few” docketed investigations against local prosecutors or former prosecutors. “We just go where the misconduct is. Either there is no misconduct, or it’s unreported to us,” Shipp said last week. A nationwide study by the Center for Public Integrity found prosecutors almost never get disciplined. Since 1970, the study found more than 2,000 cases of prosecutorial misconduct, but only 44 prosecutors faced disciplinary hearings.
Brendan Smith can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.