X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner has asked a judge to throw out an arbitration award granted to a former partner whom the firm claims failed to drum up enough business for its intellectual property practice. The law firm asserts in its petition to vacate, filed June 22 in New York State Supreme Court, that attorney Lee A. Goldberg is not entitled to the $453,463 award that he received June 5 for his breach of contract claims and for attorney’s fees. Specifically, attorneys for Thelen Reid allege that the decision by an arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association was based on an irrational construction of the agreement and that the award of attorney’s fees to Goldberg exceeded the arbitrator’s power. The law firm filed the petition in New York State Supreme Court before Justice Bernard Fried in response to a petition to confirm the arbitration award submitted by Goldberg’s attorney, Jeffrey Jannuzzo. Goldberg asserts that the law firm has failed to comply with the June 5 award and that he is entitled to money for breach of contract, attorney’s fees and interest. In July 2005, Goldberg joined Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner, which later merged with Thelen Reid & Priest. The firm brought him aboard as a contract partner from New York’s Darby & Darby after Goldberg demonstrated that he had billed about $2.2 million in 2005, according to the firm’s petition. But it ended the agreement in September 2006, after Goldberg logged billable hours equaling “about 10 hours a week,” according the law firm’s petition. During the arbitration proceedings, the arbitrator rejected the law firm’s claim of fraudulent inducement against Goldberg regarding the amount of business that he could bring to the firm. That determination led to a dispute over attorney’s fees, which are part of the dispute now in court. Jannuzzo claims that the firm overstated the amount of work it could provide to his client. “The evidence showed that the firm misled Mr. Goldberg that they had plenty of patent litigation work,” he said. The attorney representing Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, John Ohman, declined to comment beyond what was filed in court papers.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.