X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Europe came a step closer to establishing a centralized patent court recently when a group of 26 European patent judges agreed unanimously on proposed guidelines and rules of procedure for how the court could operate. Currently, each country in the European Union has its own procedures for litigating patent disputes. The European Commission, the bureaucracy that runs the European Union, mandated a European patent court seven years ago, but has yet to agree on the final language for establishing it. The judges’ committee, chaired by Sir Robin Jacobs, lord justice of appeal for England’s Court of Appeal, independently proposed rules on Nov. 4 for a new European court of original jurisdiction and a single appeals body for all cross-border patent disputes. The committee, which met in Venice, Italy, was comprised of judges from Germany, the Netherlands, France and Italy. The judges’ recommendations, which cover every aspect of patent litigation from notice and service of process to appeals and enforcement, support the European Patent Litigation Agreement, an earlier resolution that they drafted to help establish an effective forum for resolving European patent disputes. The judges sent their latest proposed rules and procedures to the European Commission. There is no timeline for approval of the recommendations. Similar to U.S. William R. Robinson, who heads the intellectual property practice at Norris McLaughlin & Marcus in Bridgewater, N.J., and has clients in France, Germany and Italy, welcomed the judges’ initiative, but said that he does not expect a European patent court to open soon. “I’m very much in favor of specialty courts,” in this instance trial judges and an appellate bench that understand patent cases, as well as making good law, Robinson said. “Conceptually, the idea is similar to what we have in the U.S., with the [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit] in Washington,” Robinson said, where all appeals of patent cases go. The new rules propose to structure the trial level proceeding in three phases. First there’s a written phase, to provide the court with a full record of the matter at issue. Then there’s an interim phase, to bring the parties together before a judge to identify the relevant facts in dispute and, finally, an oral phase, to present concise arguments to the full panel of judges who will rule. The guidelines say that a new system should “ensure that where possible a first instance decision on the merits will be reached within one year of the commencement of the proceedings and an appeal within one further year.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.