Breaking and associated brands will be offline for scheduled maintenance Friday Feb. 26 9 PM US EST to Saturday Feb. 27 6 AM EST. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
PORTLAND, Ore. — A lawyer the FBI wrongly arrested after the 2004 Madrid terrorist bombings because of a misidentified fingerprint has settled part of his lawsuit against the U.S. government for $2 million. Brandon Mayfield, who said he was detained for two weeks in 2004, maintained that he was arrested because of his Muslim faith. “Not only does my detention as a material witness in the Madrid bombing underscore the fallacy that fingerprint identification is reliable, I hope the public will remember that the U.S. government also targeted me and my family because of our Muslim religion,” he said in a news release Wednesday. The FBI referred calls for comment to the Justice Department. Department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos said the FBI has since adopted suggestions for improving its fingerprint identification process “to ensure that what happened to Mr. Mayfield does not happen again.” The U.S. issued a formal apology to Mayfield as part of the settlement, Scolinos said. Two internal Justice investigations cleared the FBI and prosecutors of wrongdoing, she said. A December 2005 review of the matter by the department’s Office of Professional Responsibility found that federal prosecutors who handled the investigation acted appropriately. A month later, Justice Inspector General Glenn A. Fine concluded Mayfield’s faith was not the reason the FBI began its investigation, and that the agency did not misuse provisions of the USA Patriot Act. Mayfield was arrested in May 2004 on the basis of a fingerprint found on a bag of detonators in Madrid that was mistakenly matched to him after the March 11, 2004 train bombings that killed 191 people and wounded more than 1,500. Mayfield was jailed on a material witness warrant but was released after the FBI acknowledged the fingerprint was not his. The government acknowledged in the settlement that it “performed covert physical searches of the Mayfield home and law office, and it also conducted electronic surveillance targeting Mr. Mayfield at both his home and law office,” according to a news release from Mayfield’s attorney, Elden Rosenthal. The settlement allows Mayfield to continue to pursue his challenge of the USA Patriot Act, Rosenthal said. Mayfield claims the act violates the Fourth Amendment because it allows government searches without probable cause that a crime has been committed. “The Patriot Act is decidedly not patriotic,” Rosenthal said. “We will vigorously pursue this constitutional challenge to the highest courts in the country.” Associated Press Writer Lara Jakes Jordan in Washington contributed to this report.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.