X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
RESIGNATION WITH CHARGES PENDING The following persons have resigned as members of the State Bar of California. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Donald Bruce Kronenberg, Seattle, Wash., April 9 Eli A. Rich, Beverly Hills, April 9 Lawrence David Samelson, Sacramento, April 9 James Franklin Thompson, Marysville, April 9 RESIGNATION WITH NO CHARGES PENDING The following persons have resigned as members of the California State Bar and their resignations have been accepted by the California Supreme Court. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Mary A. Sharrow, Athens, Ga., April 9 Michael Del Walker, Deming, Wash., April 9 Peter Blake Westdal, Los Angeles, April 9 William Walter Wissler, Tucson, Ariz., April 9 SUSPENSION The following persons have been suspended by the California Supreme Court, effective on the dates indicated. Unless otherwise noted, they are required to pass the professional responsibility exam specified in the court order and to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of Court: Richard Elliot Ackerknecht, Los Angeles � April 9: Suspended for 30 days. Two years’ probation with conditions. # Harpreet Singh Brar, Brea � April 16: Suspended for 30 days. Two years’ probation with conditions. * Scott John Flores, San Diego � April 9: Suspended for one year. Two years’ probation with conditions. Credit shall be given for the period of inactive enrollment which commenced on Dec. 23, 2005. * Roger Allen Gerdes, Carpinteria � April 16: Suspended for six months and until restitution. Must comply with conditions of probation imposed as a condition for terminating suspension. If respondent actually suspended for two years he must remain suspended until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice and learning and ability in the general law. Donald Robert Levitt, San Jose � April 16: Suspended for nine months. Two years’ probation with conditions. * Not required to pass the Professional Responsibility Examination # Not required to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of the Court REINSTATEMENT FROM SUSPENSION The following persons, originally suspended for disciplinary reasons, were reinstated on the dates set forth below upon satisfaction of all requirements: Scott Alonso Reed, Encino, April 15 PUBLIC REPROVAL The following persons have been issued a public reproval by the State Bar of California or California Supreme Court and must comply with conditions attached to the reproval. Robert Daniel Simcoe, Grants Pass, Ore., April 15

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.