X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A West Virginia high court judge who declined to recuse himself from hearing the appeal of a $50 million judgment against a company-despite the fact that its owner contributed at least $3 million to the judge’s election-has turned a spotlight back on judicial election reform. Supreme Court of Appeals Justice Brent D. Benjamin unseated incumbent Justice Warren McGraw in a November 2004 election. The contest was highlighted by seven soft money-generating committees that raised a total of nearly $7 million for judicial candidates. Benjamin’s principal donor, Don L. Blankenship, chairman and CEO of Massey Energy Co. of Richmond, Va., contributed at least $3 million to a pair of committees that ran advertisements attacking Benjamin’s opponent, as well as funds through other groups, according to the Institute on Money in Politics of Helena, Mont., a nonpartisan group that monitors state campaign finance. During this time, a $50 million jury award against the Massey Energy Co. for tortious interference and fraud in a coal contract dispute with Hugh M. Caperton and Caperton’s three companies had been pending on appeal before West Virginia’s five-member high court. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. Inc., No. 98-C-192 (Boone Co., W.Va., Cir. Ct.). In court pleadings, Caperton’s counsel argue that Blankenship’s support for Benjamin could undermine the appearance of the justice’s impartiality. Caperton’s attorney, Bruce E. Stanley of Reed Smith’s Pittsburgh office, and David B. Fawcett of Pittsburgh’s Buchanan Ingersoll, who represents Caperton’s companies, declined to comment on a pending matter. Benjamin also declined to speak on a matter before him. Deborah Goldberg, director of the Democracy Program at New York University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice, compared the situation to the imbroglio over Illinois Supreme Court Justice Lloyd A. Karmeier. Karmeier, who also denied motions to recuse, allegedly got multimillion-dollar campaign contributions from parties interested in the appellate outcomes of Avery v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., 216 Ill. 2d 100 (2005), a consumer class action that drew a $1 billion award, and Price v. Philip Morris Inc., No. 76236 (2005), a $10 billion judgment over light cigarettes. Situation to get worse? Charles G. Geyh, a professor at Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington, said polls show that the public thinks campaign spending in judicial elections influences judges’ decisions. The funding of judicial elections by special interest groups suggests that things “are only going to get worse before anyone does anything about it,” said Geyh, who is also a co-reporter on the American Bar Association’s Joint Commission to Evaluate the Model Code of Judicial Conduct. State supreme courts all agree that judges must recuse themselves if their impartiality might be questioned. But no state has adopted the ABA model code provision that sets limits for determining when recusal is proper, he said. Few would say that a $100 or $200 contribution to a judge from a lawyer or group is going to “buy justice,” Geyh said, “but you do cross the line at some point. When you’re talking about $3 million, I think there may be a ‘perception issue.’ “

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.