X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A Manhattan judge has ruled that the employee-at-will doctrine, which permits employees to be fired for any reason, does not apply to law firm associates who are terminated for refusing to go along with unethical conduct. Gerard A. Connolly, a former associate at the high-profile Manhattan personal injury firm formerly known as Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, sued the firm and its name partners last year, alleging he was asked by partner Gerald Kaiser to sign an affidavit stating that a client’s wife had signed a release waiving her claims to an $850,000 settlement. According to his complaint, Connolly did not know if the wife had signed such a release and refused to sign the affidavit. He claimed he was wrongfully fired for his “refusal to allow himself to be drawn into the cover-up of defendants’ wrongful acts.” He is asking for $15 million in damages. In largely denying the firm’s motion to dismiss Connolly’s claims, Supreme Court Justice Rolando T. Acosta extended the Court of Appeal’s 1992 decision in Wieder v. Skala, 80 N.Y.2d 628, which held that an associate fired for insisting his firm report another associate’s misconduct, as required under state Disciplinary Rule 1-103, could sue the firm for breach of an implied contract of good faith. Acosta wrote in Connolly v. Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, 105224/05, that it was “illogical” to confine Wieder to cases involving DR 1-103 and not apply it as well to those involving DR 1-102, the rule that sets out what constitutes attorney misconduct. “[A]ccording to defendants, an implied-in-law obligation exists where an associate insists that his partners report misconduct as defined in DR 1-102 to the Appellate Division Disciplinary Committee pursuant to DR 1-103, but would not be protected for refusing to engage in DR 1-102 misconduct in the first place,” the judge wrote. “The Court [of Appeals] clearly could not have intended such a result,” he said. In support, Acosta cited the Eastern District of New York federal court ruling in Kelly v. Hunton & Williams, 1999 WL 408416, in which the judge applied Wieder, finding that a firm’s action in firing an associate who raised allegations of misconduct was “inherently coercive and necessarily implies an effort to impede post-termination reporting to the Disciplinary Committee.” Connolly, who claims the firm owes him unpaid compensation, also had asked for a firm accounting. But the judge denied the request on the grounds that Connolly was not a partner and therefore not entitled to an accounting. Steven Krane of Proskauer Rose, the lawyer for Napoli Kaiser partner Marc Bern, said Acosta’s decision was an “unwarranted expansion” of the Court of Appeals’ previous decision, which could potentially open the floodgates to frivolous suits in which dismissed associates accused their firms of misconduct. “Courts have interpreted Wieder very narrowly to avoid precisely this kind of lawsuit,” said Krane. He said the firm, which is now called Napoli, Bern & Ripka, intended to appeal the decision. He also said Connolly’s factual allegations were false. The firm and Kaiser were represented by Paul Siegel of the Melville, N.Y., office of Jackson Lewis. Paul Napoli was represented by Christopher Hitchcock of Ohrenstein & Brown. John Walshe represented Connolly.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.