X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Not even a libel suit can stop the infamous Washingtonienne blogger from stirring up scandal in D.C. Last week, the defamation case against Jessica Cutler took an unexpected turn when her lawyer withdrew from the case amid allegations that he was one of the subjects of her sexually explicit blog. Until April 3, William Bode, a name partner at D.C.’s Bode & Grenier, had been representing the former Senate aide, who gained notoriety blogging about her sexual escapades. Cutler is being sued in D.C.’s federal court by former Senate staffer Robert Steinbuch, one of the men she allegedly wrote about. Bode withdrew from the case just three days after Jonathan Rosen, Steinbuch’s lawyer, accused him of engaging in a sexual relationship with Cutler that was detailed on her blog. Bode denies the claim, which was first reported on the blog Wonkette, insisting he withdrew as Cutler’s counsel because he is too busy with other cases. In court papers filed on March 31, one day after Bode began representing Cutler, Rosen argued Bode should be disqualified because he is the man Cutler referred to in her blog as “W,” a “sugar daddy” with a penchant for kinky sex who gave her large sums of money. ” �W’ is a middle-aged, lead attorney in a small Washington, DC, law firm, named William, who lives in Georgetown,” Rosen wrote, quoting Cutler’s blog. He added, “ The eponymous William H. Bode possesses each of the unique and distinguishing characteristics.” The motion also stated that Rosen plans to call Bode as a witness. For his part, Bode maintains he is not the lawyer Cutler wrote about in her blog: “She will tell them I am not Mr. W,” Bode told Legal Times. Rosen, a lawyer from Clearwater, Fla., did not return a call seeking comment. Cutler’s new attorney, solo practitioner John Umana, says he knows nothing about the alleged relationship between Bode and his client. He went on to say Cutler is a “good woman” and an “honest person” who he believes will prevail on the libel claim. Last week, Judge Paul Friedman denied Cutler’s request to dismiss the suit.
Sarah Kelley can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.