X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
RESIGNATION WITH CHARGES PENDING The following persons have resigned as members of the State Bar of California. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. John Chittenden Casey, Oakland, Feb. 19 Justin R. Dahlz, South San Francisco, Feb. 19 Hilmer Ula Jarboe Jr., West Harrison, Ind., Feb. 19 Kurt Garner Mau, Sacramento, Feb. 19 RESIGNATION WITH NO CHARGES PENDING The following persons have resigned as members of the California State Bar and their resignations have been accepted by the California Supreme Court. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Judith Trigueros Anshin, Sacramento, Feb. 19 Robert J. Baynham, Seattle, Wash., Feb. 19 Stewart Lynn Bell, Las Vegas, Nev., Feb. 19 Erno Robert Bonebakker, Portland, Maine, Feb. 19 Warren Niles Brakensiek, Los Angeles, Feb. 19 Douglass Manning Case, Vero Beach, Fla., Feb. 19 Robert William Castleberry, Coupeville, Wash., Feb. 19 Robert Ray Church, Harrisburg, Pa., Feb. 19 Virginia Lee Clark, Roseville, Feb. 19 George Bicknell Clifford, Denver, Colo., Feb. 19 Thomas Charles Cockle, Fieldbrook, Feb. 19 Arthur Brent Collier, Rancho Mirage, Feb. 19 Mary Irene Coombs, Coral Gables, Fla., Feb. 19 Mark D. Diefenderfer, San Diego, Feb. 19 Dennis Wayne Fliehman, East Lansing, Mich., Feb. 19 Mary D. Gearin-Gustaitis, Mashpee, Mass., Feb. 19 Robert Charles Gehlbach, San Diego, Feb. 19 Conrad H. Goerl, Fairfax, Feb. 19 Ronald Edgar Gother, Indian Wells, Feb. 10 Jack A. Gould, Springfield, Va., Feb. 10 Matthew Miguel Hernandez, Long Beach, Feb. 10 David Hersh, San Diego, Feb. 10 Jonathan Hubbell, Laguna Niguel, Feb. 10 Belinda Laird Hylinski, Alamo, Feb. 10 Mark Cy Kami, Prescott, Ariz., Feb. 10 Margaret Ellen Kaplan, Sonoma, Feb. 10 Douglas Charles Kearney, Dallas, Texas, Feb. 10 Pauline Tongchoo Kim, St. Louis, Mo., Feb. 10 Margot Odette Knuth, Juneau, Alaska, Feb. 10 William Harold Koch, Minneapolis, Minn., Feb. 19 John Andrews Koskinen, Washington, D.C., Feb. 19 Stanley Alvin Lever, Sherman Oaks, Feb. 19 James Lester Lofton, Santee, Feb. 19 Dennis Michael Lucarelli, Canada, Feb. 19 Arnold Leighton Lum, Honolulu, Hawaii, Feb. 19 Marilyn P. McCumber, Glendale, Feb. 10 Bruce J. MacDonald, San Diego, Feb. 19 John Keith McKeag, Rollins, Mont., Feb. 10 Thorn Chele Ndaizee Meweh, Lander, Wyo., Feb. 10 Dallas Carl Mitchell, Santa Rosa, Feb. 10 Roberta Lynn Mueller, New York, N.Y., Feb. 10 Michael Masao Murata, Honolulu, Hawaii, Feb. 10 Harvey Lee Pedersen, El Cajon, Feb. 10 John Carl Peterson, Tucson, Ariz., Feb. 10 Robert Edward Peterson, Seattle, Wash., Feb. 10 David Edward Ridenour, Whittier, Feb. 10 Stephen Russell Rubin, Las Vegas, Nev., Feb. 10 Richard Charles Schiller, Northridge, Feb. 10 William John Tewksbury, Simi Valley, Feb. 10 Constance Theisen, Knoxville, Tenn., Feb. 10 Deborah L. Thomas, Portland, Ore., Feb. 10 Robert Carl Vorwith, El Segundo, Feb. 10 Donn Herschel Wilson, Kingwood, Texas, Feb. 10 Christopher Myrlle Wyne, Raleigh, N.C., Feb. 10 SUSPENSION The following persons have been suspended by the California Supreme Court, effective on the dates indicated. Unless otherwise noted, they are required to pass the professional responsibility exam specified in the court order and to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of Court: #* Maxwell Chuck Agha, San Diego — Feb. 10: Suspended for 30 days. One year probation with conditions. * Michael Thomas Dell’Osso, Tracy — Feb. 19: Suspended for six months. Two years’ probation with conditions. # Thomas George Hrouda, Riverside — Feb. 19: Suspended for 60 days and until restitution. Two years’ probation with conditions. # Mark Emil Montpas, San Pedro — Feb. 19: Suspended for 60 days. Two years’ probation with conditions. # Thomas Leigh Upholt, Sacramento — Feb. 19: Suspended for 30 days. Two years’ probation with conditions. * Not required to pass the Professional Responsibility Examination # Not required to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of the Court

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.