Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The Senate Judiciary Committee returns this week to its most reliably entertaining subject: federal appeals court nominations and, in particular, the growing controversy over replacing Judge Stephen Trott on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. The burning question is one of geography — namely, is Trott an Idahoan or a Californian? Trott relocated from California to Idaho after joining the court, and Idaho’s two GOP senators, Larry Craig and Mike Crapo, want to replace him with Idaho state Judge Randy Smith, who has already been nominated by President George W. Bush. California Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein claim Trott’s seat for their state and accuse Idaho of making an unseemly grab for a second spot on the circuit. Of course, the first Idahoan, Boise lawyer William Myers III, was filibustered in 2004 and his nomination is still pending. On Feb. 13 the California senators sent an indignant letter to White House Counsel Harriet Miers. Imagine, they wrote, “if both these seats are assigned to Idaho, Idaho would have 7.2% of the Circuit’s judges, despite having 1.2% of its caseload.” No matter that circuit courts distribute their cases equally among all their judges regardless of where they sit. “We all get the same caseload,” says an exasperated Trott, who spent 17 years in California as a district attorney and a U.S. attorney before going to Washington in 1983 for a five-year stint as a top official in the Reagan Justice Department. “I think this whole thing is ridiculous,” adds Trott, who moved to Idaho in 1988, just after his confirmation. “I’ve owned property in Idaho since 1971. I pulled up stakes completely in California.” Argues Craig: “We’ve had two 9th Circuit judges residing in Idaho for 18 years. I’m fighting for the status quo.” There’s one problem with that argument, notes federal appeals court scholar Sheldon Goldman. “The allocation was for a Californian, and at that time, Trott was considered a Californian. He subsequently moves to another state, but that doesn’t mean the seat goes with him forever. It’s all pretty parochial.” Craig isn’t backing off. “There’s no question Trott was nominated out of California. But he never returned there.” And besides, Craig adds, Bush has already nominated an Idahoan. “That is the power of the presidency.”
T.R. Goldman can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.