X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
When a parent with full custody of a child wants to move, the California Supreme Court says the noncustodial parent may try for a new custody arrangement � but doesn’t necessarily get to put his kid on the witness stand to make his case. On Thursday, the high court’s decision ended Anthony Yana’s hopes of changing a custody arrangement based on his ex-wife’s move from San Luis Obispo County to Nevada with their son. But the published opinion may still come in handy for other noncustodial parents who find themselves in similar circumstances. The unanimous court found that, while a parent without legal or physical custody is not automatically entitled to an evidentiary hearing in a move-away case, he may still be able to get one � if he makes an initial showing that the relocation would be detrimental to the child. “An evidentiary hearing serves no legitimate purpose or function where the noncustodial parent is unable to make a prima facie showing of detriment in the first instance, or has failed to identify a material but contested factual issue,” wrote Justice Marvin Baxter. The trial court was within its discretion when it turned down Yana’s request to modify custody without giving him an evidentiary hearing on the matter, the high court concluded. The justices noted that there was no hint the mother was moving in order to limit Yana’s contact with his son. And they remarked that other evidence Yana was offering, such as information about the transient nature of Las Vegas’ population and its crime and school drop-out rates, was too abstract to prove any harm to his son. But the court rejected one of the mother’s broader arguments, that relocation would not, under any circumstances, give a judge reason to change her custody arrangements or grant an evidentiary hearing. “The custodial parent’s right to relocate with a child remains subject to the changed circumstance rule,” Baxter wrote. Along the same lines, the court also said the Second District Court of Appeal misinterpreted In re Marriage of Campos when it sided 2-1 with Yana. Campos does not give the noncustodial parent opposing a move an absolute right to an evidentiary hearing to establish detriment, Baxter wrote. “Reasonably viewed, Campos simply recognized the duty of the trial court to consider all relevant issues in a move-away case.” Huntington Beach solo Jeffrey Doeringer, who argued for the mother before the Supreme Court, predicts that the opinion’s statements on Campos will lead trial courts to take a “sharper look” at a noncustodial parent’s allegations in move-away cases. “The entitlement espoused in Campos has been restricted,” he said. The lawyer who argued for Yana, John Hodges of Arroyo Grande, was apparently out of the country Thursday and could not be reached for comment. Thursday’s opinion included Second District Justice Candace Cooper, who sat pro tem during the November oral argument. The case is In re Marriage of Brown and Yana, 06 C.D.O.S. 1036.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.