Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Was William Shakespeare a lawyer? At first blush, the suggestion sounds absurd, as though the playwright had a secret day job. And yet, tucked away in the Bard of Avon’s many plays and sonnets, one can find dozens of legal terms, including “pleadings,” “plaintiffs,” “defendants,” “appellants” and “juries,” to name just a few. Shakespeare’s use of legal jargon has fueled a long-running debate over whether the dramatist practiced, or at least studied, law in his youth. As early as the 18th century, critics began to remark on the abundance of legalisms in his work, and from that observation spun an elaborate tale of how Shakespeare had been a student in London’s Inns of Court and then an attorney’s clerk. It’s a wonderful image, the young playwright poring over a dusty statute book: “2(b) or not 2(b): that is the section!” But unfortunately, there is scant evidence for the theory that Shakespeare ever studied law. In fact, there is none. Except � and here’s the thing � Shakespeare’s own words. For the man clearly knew his litigation.
His writings are peppered with the language of the courts, as in “Twelfth Night,” when Olivia assures the neurotic Malvolio, “Thou shalt be both the plaintiff and the judge of thine own cause.” Which, when you think about it, doesn’t sound so bad. In “Othello,” the treacherous Iago complains that the title character “nonsuits my mediators.” To be nonsuited was the equivalent of having one’s complaint summarily dismissed � an Elizabethan 12(b)(6) motion, if you will. More ham-handedly, Sonnet 46 portrays a lawsuit between the author’s eye and heart for possession of his beloved. Here we get both “plead” and “plea,” “defendant,” “title,” “quest” (short for inquest or jury), “impaneled” and “verdict.” The jury decides the matter by giving each party a “moiety” (an old Law French expression for a half-interest): Namely, the eye gets the beloved’s outward beauty, while the heart gets her inner love. Yuck! Even more familiar is Portia’s statement in “The Merchant of Venice” that she and her fellow plotters shall be served with “interrogatories, and we will answer all things faithfully.” And again in “King John,” the king asks a trifle impatiently, “What earthy name to interrogatories can task the free breath of a sacred king?” How, you might ask, did Shakespeare learn about ‘rogs? The hard way, it turns out, for he was served with interrogatories in the 1612 lawsuit of Mountjoy v. Bellot (back then, third-party witnesses could be made to answer interrogatories). His signed answers are reportedly still available for inspection at the United Kingdom’s Public Records Office. At times, Shakespeare even bandied about highly technical legal terms. In “Henry VIII,” for example, he refers to a “writ of premunire” (a corruption of the Latin praemonere, to forewarn), which was a rare type of proceeding in the ecclesiastical courts. And in “Richard II,” Bolingbroke complains, “I am denied to sue my livery here” � a suit of livery being a lawsuit to compel the delivery of an estate that had been held in trust. Intriguingly, certain lines in Shakespeare can be understood only in light of the leading cases of the day. For example, in “Twelfth Night,” Sir Toby Belch urges Sir Andrew Aguecheek to insult Cesario as follows: “If thou thou’st him thrice, it shall not be amiss.” The phrase is incomprehensible without knowing that in Shakespeare’s day, prosecutors would use the “thou” form of address when delivering the most withering cross-examinations. The practice became a verb � “to thou.” Shortly before “Twelfth Night” was performed, Sir Walter Raleigh had been prosecuted in a notorious trial in which the attorney general unleashed a volley of contemptuous thous against the defendant. Eventually, the prosecutor worked himself up to a slashing, though rather ridiculous, crescendo by crying, “I thou thee, thou traitor!” This was too ripe for satire to resist: Shakespeare quickly revised “Twelfth Night” to include the reference to thouing. Shakespeare was no slouch at transactions, either, as we see in “Pericles,” where Gower describes a search being made “with all due diligence.” Indeed, this might be the first recorded use of “due diligence.” It might also explain why the play is not better known.
It was in the field of real property, however, that the Bard really excelled. Like his father before him, Shakespeare dabbled in real estate, and he naturally gravitated to the vocabulary of property law. In “Hamlet,” for example, Horatio refers to kings who “stand seized” of their lands � using “seized” (also spelled “seised”) in the legal sense of possession. The concept of holding title in fee simple cast a powerful spell on Shakespeare as a symbol of permanent ownership. In “The Merry Wives of Windsor,” one of the merry wives describes Falstaff as being held by the devil “in fee simple.” A character in “All’s Well That Ends Well” would “sell the fee simple of his salvation” for a pittance. And the term appears in a number of other plays and sonnets. In contrast to the fee simple, a lease to Shakespeare stood for all that was temporary and fleeting. Beauty, for example, was an estate that is merely “held in lease,” while in Sonnet 18 the Bard laments that “summer’s lease hath all too short a date” � a familiar concept for those with Hamptons rentals. In “Henry VI,” one character refers to having a “lease of life,” a metaphor that continues today as a lease on life. And let us not forget that when Hamlet famously picks up a skull as a prop for his soliloquy, it is “the skull of a lawyer.” And that is why our hero asks, “Where be his quiddities now, his quillities, his cases, his tenures and his tricks?” Quiddities and quillities, by the way, are Latin-based terms referring to the hair-splitting arguments that lawyers like to make. In the same passage, Hamlet imagines that the deceased lawyer might have specialized in real estate “with his statutes, his recognizes, his fines, his double vouchers, his recoveries” � all of these being technical terms used in Shakespeare’s day for property transactions. One can only conclude that, for a Dane, Hamlet had an exceptionally good grasp of English law. As a lover of wordplay, Shakespeare often made puns on legal jargon. In “As You Like It,” when three wrestlers are described as “proper young men of excellent growth and presence,” the fair Rosalind replies “with bills on their necks, ‘Be it known unto all men by these presents.’” The latter were the opening words of every deed poll (an ancient term for a binding covenant, such as a promissory note). The words are still used today in many boilerplate documents. But wait, you say, wasn’t Shakespeare the guy who wanted to “kill all the lawyers”? Actually, Shakespeare put those words into the mouth of Jack Cade, who is plotting a rebellion against the Crown in “Henry VI.” The fact that such a treasonous fellow wants to get rid of lawyers is often interpreted as a positive point: namely, that lawyers are the protectors of traditional English liberties. That said, it seems likely that the line was calculated to get an appreciative snort from the audience, as it still does today. In the final analysis what’s important is not whether Shakespeare was a lawyer, but that he understood the law as a potent metaphor for life. Arguing about the extent of his legal training is probably a waste of time, or as the Bard himself put it, “tis like the breath of an unfee’d lawyer.” Adam Freedman is a lawyer practicing in New York and the author of “Elated by Details” ( Mayhaven). This article originally appeared in the New York Law Journal, an ALM publication.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.