Because the appellant's motion for post-conviction DNA testing fails to meet two of the preconditions to obtaining DNA testing under Chapter 64, specifically that the evidence still exists and that identity is or was an issue in the case, it also fails to demonstrate reasonable grounds for a motion to be filed.
January 16, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Cozen O Connor is seeking an associate with at least three years of experience defending clients in employment litigation matters to join th...
Busy and growing general practice seeks NY admitted associate, with 3+ years experience in divorce/family law. The ideal candidate will be a...
Boutique downtown Manhattan firm seeking an experienced litigation associate with experience in landlord-tenant and real estate litigation. ...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP would like to announce that...
