X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
I’m trying real hard not to become a xenophobe. The president’s helping. It’s difficult to develop an unhealthy fear of things foreign when things domestic are scaring the bejeezus out of you. So I guess I should be grateful to the present administration for that. And to past administrations. One of the drawbacks of being a centrist is that you’re pretty much surrounded by things that convince you the world is going to hell in a handbasket. So I spend a lot of time griping about “the present administration.” In the immortal words of Gerry Rafferty, “Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am: stuck in the middle with you.” Still, I can feel my grip on one-worldness slipping away. It’s becoming harder and harder for me to cling to the article of faith that the Small World ride at Disneyland is an accurate representation of the citizens of the world. The wooden midgets beside my boat at Disneyland all seem to be the same, but the ones collecting euros and suicide bombs in other parts of the world just may be . . . well . . . differentthan you and me. I don’t mean to make a competition out of mental instability. There’s really nothing to be gained by trying to decide whether our American human cannonball family is crazier than the Norwegian officials who arranged hunting furloughs for lifers in Greenland. But I am concerned that more and more I seem to be deluged by things done by crazy foreigners and forwarded to me by less crazy locals.[ 1] The latest is from MSNBC. According to MSNBC, “The city of Rome has banned goldfish bowls, which animal rights activists say are cruel, and has made regular dog walks mandatory in the Italian capital.” I’m sorry, but ledes[ 2] like that make me expect not so much a news story as a punchline. I find myself listening for a rim-shot. It’s hard for me to take stories like this seriously. Apparently the Romans have concluded that since they have no hurricanes, weapons of mass destruction, foreign terrorists or Supreme Court fiascos, they’re in danger of losing traction as a major player on the world scene. I mean, Vercingetorix is dead, their Olympics were 45 years ago, and you can only do the Pope/chimney/smoke thing so many times before it gets old. Yeah, I know they’re long on ruins, but so’s Baghdad, and the tourists aren’t exactly beating down the door there, either. So the City Council decided to “go in another direction.”[ 3] Following the lead[ 4] of the northern Italian city of Turin, Rome has required that all dog owners “regularly exercise their dogs.”
Can you imagine what a nightmare that will be to prosecute? Just what constitutes “regular” exercise? My wife has a regular exercise schedule which comprises five times a week. My regular haircut appointment comes around monthly. I sit in my regular seat at Angels games 20 times a year. “Regular” is a word that doesn’t merely invite lawsuits, but prostrates itself in sackcloth and ashes and fairly begsfor them. The lawyers for the city of Turin saw this problem and advised the Torino council, when they passed theirdog-walking law, that it had to be more specific. Unfortunately, they appear not to have advised their council the law had to be sane. Theirlaw imposes a $598 fine (500 euros) if dog owners don’t walk their dogs at least THREE TIMES A DAY! Three times a day! Seven days a week! $600 per violation! Do the math: Fido’s got a gun to your head. “Walk me now or walk to work tomorrow, ’cause you’re gonna have to hock the car to pay the fines.” I’m sorry, folks. I love dogs. I really do. I think the existence of dogs is one of the better arguments for the existence of God. This is the first time in my life I’ve gone more than a couple of years without a dog, and it’s only because my yard is about the size of second base. But I’ve never owned a dog I would walk three times a day. Think about it. Up at six, walk the dog. Go to work. Come home, walk the dog. Eat, watch The News Hour, walk the dog, go to bed. You’d eventually die with great-looking legs, a happy dog, and no heirs. I’m surprised the Chinese haven’t thought about this: Forget about limiting offspring, just give every citizen a dog and make thrice-daily dog walking mandatory. Malthus would be greatly reassured. I dunno. I’m not sure I’d want to be a dog in Italy these days. According to animal rights groups, “around 150,000 pet dogs . . . are abandoned in Italy every year.” If they enforce these laws in Turin and Rome, that number’s gonna go way up. Italian dogs are gonna be more endangered than snail darters. The fish thing, on the other hand is clearly a good idea. Banning goldfish bowls is something my mother would have voted for 50 years ago. Every year our school would hold a carnival. The carnivals always had themes and names and special decorations, but they should have all been called The Festival of the Furshlugginer Fish. We kids would empty our piggy banks and use our nickels and dimes[ 5] to buy chances in various ring-toss, beanbag-toss, and ball-toss contests in which, if we were skillful enough[ 6], we could win a goldfish. I can’t for the life of me remember why we wantedthe goldfish. They were inedible, untalented, inarticulate and boring. But at least they didn’t have to be walked three times a day, and I can remember being desperate to win one. One year I won five and my mother threatened to resign from the PTA. The result of all these fish-winning contests was a veritable bonanza for the local pet shop, which not only wrote off the fish donation to the school, but sold all our parents the bowls, fish food, gravel, garnish and little plastic castles to swim through we all thought necessary to make the fishes a part of our families.
It never mattered. The fish invariably lasted about as long as the Miers nomination, but I’m sure it was good for the economy and the school budgets. We had new dodgeballs every year. But now Roman scientists have determined that “round bowls caused fish to go blind.”[ 7] I’m not sure how this works but it kinda makes sense to me.[ 8] I mean, think about it. You know how a fisheye lens distorts images? Now multiply that by the distortive effect of a round fishbowl. Now imagine how a cat’s face must look when viewed through those two prisms. If hysterical blindness didn’t result from that, it would only be because the fish wasn’t paying attention. I think the Italians are onto something here,[ 9] but I have to counsel caution, since I’ve been lied to before about what causes blindness. Besides, I’m not exactly sure how you’d go about testing for fish blindness. You can’t use an eye chart because as soon as you put it into the water, it would get all soggy and the letters would run. Suffice it to say, I never saw one of my fish bump into the side of the bowl, and they seemed to find their food OK, so we may want to wait for replication of the Roman studies before we hand our fishbowls over to PETA. Nonetheless, I’m concerned that all us kids may have been using dodgeballs purchased with blood money. I mean, who wants to whack Ricky Roleter with a dodgeball if the cost is large-scale fish blindness? I’m concerned that our tiny little moral compasses may not have been attuned to the pole of Carassius auratus. And I applaud the Romans for raising my consciousness. Maybe I should just accept this as an example of what a legislative body can do if it can get past partisan infighting. Maybe overcoming petty interests of party and faction enables you not only to deal sensibly with fossil fuels, global warming, potholes and trash collection, but to find time for debate over dog walking and fish myopia. Maybe I should wonder why my own city council hasn’t taken steps to protect Pluto and Nemo. Or maybe I should just wonder if xenophobia hasn’t gotten a bad rap. Contributing writer William W. Bedsworthis an associate justice at the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana. He writes this column to get it out of his system. You can read more columns like this in “A Criminal Waste of Time,” a book fromThe Recorder featuring more than 30 of the best columns from Justice Bedsworth. Order by calling (800)587-9288 or by going to www.lawcatalog.com/bedsworth.
Footnotes [ 1] Although the “less crazy” part is marginal. They are, after all, readers of this column. [ 2] This word wasn’t in my dictionary, and probably won’t be in yours. Looks like something out of Chaucer to me, but my editors assure me that is how we now refer to the “lead sentence” in a news story. [ 3] I don’t know that the City Council actually used this phrase, but it’s one that’s become very popular amongst organizations doing crazy stuff for no good reason, so I thought they might like to avail themselves of it. [ 4] This you canfind in your dictionary, and the journalism types apparently don’t care how I spell dancing terms. [ 5] These are currency denominations unknown to modern children; if you tell this story to your child, just lie and say you used dollars. Otherwise, you’ll end up in a conversation which can only lead to admitting that you’re saddling them with a national debt so huge that the only appropriate response is to kill you on the spot. You don’t want that. [ 6] Or completely unskillful, but lucky enough to be there on the last day when they were desperate to move fish. [ 7] I assume they were Roman scientists, since Reuters indicates Rome is the only place on the whole, bloody planet to identify fishbowls as an ocular problem. [ 8] A statement which can be applied to my understanding of almost any technology more complex than a doorknob. [ 9] Words I haven’t uttered since I discovered pesto.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.