Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The sound of popping corks across the country has quieted considerably since the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in May that found bans on direct-to-consumer wine shipments are unconstitutional unless those restrictions apply to in-state wineries as well. Despite the court’s decision and the celebration surrounding the case, a number of states are declining their invitation to the “Vintner’s Ball” and instead are opting to restrict their own in-state wineries from shipping directly to residents rather than open up their borders to outsiders. Such a move would bring those states into compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling, albeit not in the way many in the wine industry had hoped. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s opinion in Granholm v. Healdobserved that “[t]ime and time again this Court has held that, in all but the narrowest circumstances, state laws violate the Commerce Clause if they mandate ‘differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter.’ “ While states argued they maintain the right to do as they please with alcoholic beverages under the 21st Amendment, Kennedy was quick to point out that “straightforward attempts to discriminate in favor of local producers [are] not saved by the Twenty-first Amendment.” One of the problems associated with bans on commerce, according to Kennedy, is that they “deprive citizens of their right to have access to the markets of other states on equal terms.” That notion of equality is central to the constitutional issue. If states treat their home businesses the same way as they do out-of-staters, that’s just fine under the commerce clause. That type of reasoning is just what is driving those jurisdictions that want to maintain the status quo. It is troubling to think that states would punish their home wineries just to maintain the chokehold they have had over the wine and spirits industry since Prohibition ended in 1933. But given the revenue generated from the system that has long been in place, it’s not surprising. At a time when other agricultural businesses are struggling, wineries have experienced a boom. Wineries can be found in every state, and new ones are cropping up each year. To be competitive, however, small wineries-typically family-operated businesses-need the ability to ship directly to consumers. In many cases, it is cost-prohibitive for them to participate in the tripartite system of distributors, wholesalers and retailers that has made a lot of folks rich for a very long time.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.