X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
NEW YORK — Lawsuits by firefighters and rescue workers who claim they suffered respiratory injuries at the World Trade Center site belong in federal, not state, court, a federal appeals court ruled last week. In a 46-page decision, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals questioned the reasoning of a Southern District judge who remanded to state court all suits dealing with injuries after Sept. 29, 2001, the day the World Trade Center rescue operation officially ended. The appeals court, however, left it up to the judge, Southern District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, to rectify the matter, saying it was prohibited from reviewing an order that remanded cases to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, even if the order was erroneous. But the appeals court clearly suggested what action Judge Hellerstein should take. “Given our view that the respiratory injury claims before the district court are pre-empted by [the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (ATSSSA) of 2001] and are claims over which the district court has exclusive jurisdiction, we invite the district court, in any such actions as remain pending before it, to reconsider so much of its decision as ordered remands to state court,” wrote Judge Amalya Kearse for the unanimous court. Lawyers for the plaintiffs and attorneys representing the city and contractors named in the suits said they expected Judge Hellerstein to reclaim the cases. He had stayed his remand order until the Second Circuit could weigh in. “The ball is in Judge Hellerstein’s court,” said Kenneth Becker, an assistant corporation counsel who is chief of the office’s World Trade Center division. “We have every reason to believe that Judge Hellerstein will follow this decision,” said James Tyrrell, a partner at the Newark office of Latham & Watkins, which is acting as lead counsel for the city and its contractors. Attorneys for the plaintiffs — hundreds of firefighters who say they suffered debilitating, even career-ending respiratory injuries from toxic fumes at the site — had urged Judge Hellerstein to remand the suits to state court. The Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act, enacted shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, limited the city’s liability in Trade Center lawsuits to the greater of $350 million or the city’s insurance coverage. In state court, the plaintiffs would not have had to contend with a cap. Last week, though, Frank Floriani, a partner at Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, which represents 175 firefighters, said the plaintiffs would not be hurt by a move to federal court. “We are OK with that,” he said. “Our causes of action are still intact.” The Second Circuit affirmed Judge Hellerstein as to the cases he kept under his jurisdiction. But it questioned the dividing lines the judge created when he ruled that all claims after Sept. 29, along with any claims that arose from debris that was moved off site, whether or not they arose before Sept. 29, would not be covered by the federal act. “The district court’s geographical line would mean that, as to a given pile of debris that gave off toxic fumes both at the World Trade Center site and at a marine transfer station or the landfill to which it was transported, the claim of a worker who inhaled those fumes at the World Trade Center site would be pre-empted, while the claim of a worker who inhaled fumes from the same debris at either of the other sites would not,” Judge Kearse wrote. “In sum, in making the ATSSSA-created federal cause of action the exclusive remedy for damages arising out of the September 11 plane crashes, Congress clearly expressed its intent to preempt state-law remedies for damages claims arising out of those crashes.” Tom Perrotta is a reporter with the New York Law Journal, a Recorder affiliate.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.