X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The results of our annual survey of the top revenue-generating law offices in the D.C. area yielded a strange brew of market phenomena. Combined gross for all D.C. 20 firms for 2004 was $3.93 billion — a 6 percent increase over 2003 — and overall head count increased last year, from 5,352 in ’03 to 5,415 in ’04. There was one notable area in which many firms saw a dip: the number of equity partners. According to the survey, the number of equity partners has declined 10 percent over 2003 stats — from 1,638 in ’03 to to 1,480 in ’04. There were 543 non-equity partners at D.C. 20 firms in 2004 compared with 433 in 2003 — a 25 percent increase. Yet the drop in the number of equity partners and the rise in the non-equity ranks failed to nudge up the area’s average profits per partner, which stood at a relatively unchanged $935,000. Average revenue per lawyer, however, shot up $30,000, from $700,000 in ’03 to $730,000. Odd, isn’t it? More associates working at a higher rate of productivity with fewer stakeholders taking home a share of the revenue pie, and yet no skyrocketing PPP? Of course, these are just averages and some individual firms saw very different results. For a snapshot of the year that was for the firms, check out the profiles on them. As with our survey in previous years, we calculated financial figures based on the performance of a firm’s metro D.C. office. If a firm had more than one office in the D.C. area, we combined the revenues to reflect total revenue for this region. We defined the D.C. metro area as the District of Columbia, Northern Virginia, and Prince George’s and Montgomery counties in Maryland. Head counts of total lawyers and partners are as of Aug. 31, 2004, and include only full-time equivalent positions. Even when a firm cooperates in the survey, we make every effort to test the financial figures it provides. We not only do our own calculations, but also call current and former partners, clients, and competitors, and pore over court and public records to discern billing rates and compensation figures, among other things. - The Editors

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.