Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Fear that federal prosecutors will continue to pressure corporations under investigation to waive attorney-client privilege and work-product protections hampers corporate compliance efforts, say two surveys of corporate lawyers released this month. Putting the squeeze on corporations to waive these rights in exchange for leniency has had unintended effects on corporations trying to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations, said Susan Hackett, senior vice president and general counsel of the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC). “Prosecutors’ efforts are having the perverse opposite effect on our efforts to promote accountability and transparency,” Hackett said. “The message they’re sending is to shut up and go for deep cover. They’re not going to seek out their lawyer anymore when their lawyer could well become Exhibit A for the prosecution.” The U.S. Department of Justice did not return calls seeking comment. ACC found that 30% of the clients of the 363 in-house lawyers who responded to its survey had “personally experienced” an erosion in protections afforded by attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine, since Enron collapsed about four years ago. That percentage leapt to 47.6% of the clients of the 356 outside counsel who responded to the White Collar Crime Project of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). Project director Stephanie Martz asserted that the risk of losing the privilege makes for less candor, and a fear to put things in writing. “Our efforts are made particularly difficult when lawyers have to begin interviews with employees with Miranda warnings,” said Martz. “That’s no way to seriously probe for problems and try to solve them.”
Worries Over Erosion of Privilege Percentage of clients who have experienced an erosion in privilege and work-product protection in the last four years: 48% outside counsel 30% in-house counsel Party most likely to dissuade attorneys from asserting privilege: In-house: opposing parties ( 22%) Outside counsel: federal prosecutors ( 25%) Circumstances in which regulators should be allowed to request disclosure: (in-house counsel) 44% under no circumstances 22% privilege still protected as to third parties 8% criminal investigation of a leader the company has terminated 7% criminal investigation of company leader 7% in settlement that would limit company liability Percentage of senior-level employees who are aware of/rely on privilege when consulting attorneys: 93% in-house 88% outside Sources: Associate of Corporate Counsel and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Waive goodbye Commentary to Federal Sentencing Guidelines that took effect last November say that failure to waive attorney-client privilege and work-product protections won’t be held against an entity or official in scoring points for sentence reductions based on cooperation “unless such waiver is necessary in order to provide timely and thorough disclosure of all pertinent information known to the organization.” That’s a giant “unless,” said Andrew Good of Boston’s Good & Cormier, who often represents corporate officers in criminal matters. “The practical reality is that the [Department of Justice] policy is to penalize corporate defendants who do not waive attorney-client privilege,” asserted Good. “You get a more lenient deal if you do and a less favorable deal if you don’t. The exception swallows the rule.” Corporations can avoid being charged at all or can lessen their potential culpability by waiving their attorney-client privilege and work-product protections, according to a January 2003 memo written by then-Deputy Attorney General Larry D. Thompson to department heads. Thompson, who is now senior vice president, government affairs; general counsel; and secretary of Purchase, N.Y.-based PepsiCo, was not available for comment. An issue of trust The surveys, designed by ACC, reflect that in-house and outside counsel see pretty much the same landscape. About 96% of those surveyed agreed that the privilege improves a lawyer’s ability to monitor, enforce and/or improve a company’s compliance initiatives. The crux of any attorney-client relationship is trust, said Laura Stein, general counsel of Oakland, Calif.-based cleaning products maker The Clorox Co., and chairwoman of ACC’s advocacy committee. And that’s not diminished by the fact that a client is a corporation. “It is crucial to encourage employees of the client to feel comfortable discussing even the most sensitive matters,” said Stein. “Which will lead to greater compliance.” Ninety-three percent of in-house counsel believe that their senior-level corporate clients rely on the privilege. Barry Nagler, general counsel of Pawtucket, R.I.-based toy maker Hasbro Inc. and ACC’s treasurer, explained why. “In-house counsel are uniquely engaged in the front end of decision-making and can prevent bad things from happening,” said Nagler. “But you can’t stop what you don’t know.” NACDL and ACC filed separate amicus briefs in the appeal by the Arthur Andersen accounting firm from its criminal conviction for obstruction of justice. That conviction-which was effectively a death sentence for the company-was based on advice the firm got from an in-house counsel. Andersen v. U.S., No. 04-368 (5th Cir.). Oral arguments are set for April 27.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.