X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
disbarment The following persons have been disbarred by the California Supreme Court, effective on the dates indicated. They are ineligible to practice law, and their names have been stricken from the roster of California attorneys. They must comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of the Court. Alvin Gilbert Tenner, Northridge, Dec. 17 John Robert Suckling, San Diego, Dec. 17 resignation with charges pending The following persons have resigned as members of the State Bar of California. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Michael James Calhoun, Danville, Dec. 24 Daniel Raymond DelPriore, Hagatna, Guyana, Dec. 17 Owen George Fiore, Kooskia, Idaho, Dec. 24 Bradford Jonathan Peugeot, Los Angeles, Dec. 24 William Henry Randall, Tustin, Dec. 24 resignation with no charges pending The following persons have resigned as members of the California State Bar and their resignations have been accepted by the California Supreme Court. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Judith Ellen Finfrock, San Francisco, Dec. 17 Elizabeth Rees, Alexandria, Va., Dec. 17 Neil Austin Thomason, Sonora, Dec. 17 Suspension The following persons have been suspended by the California Supreme Court, effective on the dates indicated. Unless otherwise noted, they are required to pass the professional responsibility exam specified in the court order and to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of Court: # Arthur Edward Azdair, Alhambra — Dec. 17: Suspended for 30 days. If the period of actual suspension is two years or greater, remain suspended until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and learning and ability in the general law. If respondent is actually suspended for 90 days or more, he is further ordered to comply with rule 955.3. Three years probation with conditions. Laura Padilla Berger, Carmel — Dec. 17: Suspended for 90 days and until restitution and until State Bar Court grants motion to terminate suspension. If the period of actual suspension is two years or greater, remain suspended until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice and learning and ability in the general law. # Scott John Flores, San Diego — Dec. 17: Suspended for 30 days. Two years probation with conditions. Gabriel Scott Ganor, Venice — Dec. 17: Suspended for one year. Two years probation with conditions. # Michael Edward Kelly, Phoenix, Ariz. — Dec. 17: Suspended for 45 days. Two years probation with conditions. John G. Monkman Jr., Palm Springs — Dec. 24: Suspended for 90 days. Two years probation with conditions. #* Mark Morris, Beverly Hills — Dec. 24: Suspended for six months. One year probation with conditions. # Tam Nguyen, San Jose — Dec. 24: Suspended for 45 days. Five years probation with conditions. John Robert Noble, Irvine — Dec. 17: Suspended for one year and until restitution and compliance with the fee arbitration conditions imposed in Case No. S118197. Two years probation with conditions. # Shawn Michael Sornson, Salem, Ore. — Dec. 24: Suspended for 30 days. Eighteen months probation with conditions. # Dennis Eugene Tamborin, Van Nuys — Dec. 17: Suspended for 60 days and until State Bar Court grants motion to terminate suspension. If the period of actual suspension is two years or greater, remain suspended until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and learning and ability in the general law. If respondent is actually suspended for 90 days or more, he is further ordered to comply with rule 955. * Not required to pass the Professional Responsibility Examination # Not required to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of the Court Reinstatement from suspension The following persons, originally suspended for disciplinary reasons, were reinstated on the dates set forth below upon satisfaction of all requirements: Robert Spelger, Venice Beach, Dec. 28

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.