Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In last year's term, the high court issued a critical ruling on 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) providing that district courts upon application of an interested person "may order" a person residing or found in the district to give testimony or produce documents "for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal." In Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc. , the court held that a U.S. company was not "categorically" barred from seeking information under � 1782 for an antitrust investigation pending.
December 13, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS