The trial court could have reasonably concluded that the necessity of individualized determinations regarding alleged misrepresentations and failure to disclose, the application of the law to those facts, and questions related to damages reasonably foreclosed certification of the class. Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to certify the class.
November 08, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The Oregon State Bar (OSB) regulates the practice of law in Oregon and provides a variety of services to its members and the public. The mis...
This outstanding general practice firm is currently seeking a seasoned Patent Associate, Attorney or Counsel with substantial patent prosecu...
This large and well-regarded biopharma company is seeking a transactional/licensing attorney to join their team. The ideal candidate must ha...
MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL
GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.
