Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
As courts, prosecutors and defense lawyers around the country await clarification from the U.S. Supreme Court on its decision in Blakely v. Washington, the 2d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has decided that, at least for the moment, the federal sentencing guidelines remain constitutional. The court released a per curiam opinion on Aug. 12 saying it was appropriate to give direction to lower courts given the “considerable consternation and concern” caused by Blakely, which held that a Washington state sentencing scheme that allowed judges-not juries-to make findings that increase a defendant’s sentence beyond a fixed range violated the Sixth Amendment. A three-judge panel of Rosemary Pooler, Robert D. Sack and Reena Raggi rejected the challenge brought by two defendants to the constitutionality of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, saying that circuit precedent on the guidelines remains good law until the U.S. Supreme Court says otherwise. The appeals court upheld sentence enhancements for two men convicted of firearms offenses in U.S. v. Mincey, No. 03-1419. The court decided to proceed despite the fact the U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two cases and has set oral arguments for Oct. 4 on the applicability of the Blakely rationale to the guidelines in two cases, U.S. v. Booker and U.S. v. Fanfan. The panel also decided to proceed while the full 2d Circuit awaits word from the Supreme Court on its unusual request to accept certified questions on Blakely, made on July 12 in U.S. v. Penaranda. U.S. v. Mincey is the appeal of brothers Tyshea Mincey and DeShawn Ferrell from 2003 convictions for conspiracy to violate federal firearms law, unlicensed firearms dealing and interstate transportation and receipt of firearms. Evidence at a trial before Judge Charles L. Brieant of New York’s southern district showed that the brothers traveled several times to Georgia in 2001 and enlisted “straw purchasers” for weapons they shipped to New York for sale. Brieant sentenced Ferrell to 19 years and 6 months in prison and Mincey to 4 years and 3 months. Both sentences were at the high end of the guideline range. They were applied by Brieant based on facts he found by a preponderance of the evidence. Without the enhancements, Ferrell’s guideline range would have been 41 to 51 months in prison. Mincey’s range would have been 10 to 16 months.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.