Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A move to “defund” an American Bar Association committee is being hotly contested by some who argue that the group’s demise will stifle the voice of the small firm and solo contingent within the organization. The ABA’s board of governors will vote on Aug. 6 at the association’s annual meeting in Atlanta whether to defund the Standing Committee on Solo and Small Firm Practitioners-a move that, if approved, will effectively mark the end of the 12-member group created in 1995. The chair of the solo and small firm committee, Joseph Crosthwait, plans to argue to the ABA’s program and planning committee a day before the budget’s approval that the decision to pull funding will undermine the ability of small firm and solo practitioners to participate in ABA policy and rule-making. ABA senior management made the recommendation to defund the committee after it determined that the concerns of small firm and solo practitioners already were addressed by its Section of General Practice, Solo and Small Firms, said Sarina Butler, an ABA senior manager and the associate executive director for its communication group. Butler said that the standing committee initially was created because no section existed for solo and small firm practitioners at the time. She also said that ABA senior management felt that small firm and solo lawyers would be adequately represented by other practice-area sections within the ABA. ‘Extremely disappointing’ “We think that’s a mistake,” said Crosthwait, a solo practitioner in Midwest City, Okla. He noted that attorneys who want to become members of the solo and small firm section must pay a $35 fee plus annual fees that start at $275 and increase incrementally. The standing committee was particularly involved in the ABA’s adoption of the Rules of Professional Conduct related to multidisciplinary practices and the sale of practices, Crosthwait said. Bruce Dorner, a solo practitioner in Londonderry, N.H., and a former member of the standing committee, called the proposal “extremely disappointing.” He added that it is the only entity within ABA that reaches across all boundaries to serve the interests of solo and small firm attorneys.” The Standing Committee on Solo and Small Firm Practitioners had requested a budget of $139,000 this year.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.