Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Supreme Court�s June 24 decision in Blakely v. Washington has thrown federal sentencing procedures into disarray. During oral arguments, the second question asked was whether invalidating the Washington sentencing scheme would also invalidate the federal guidelines. The attorney for Ralph Blakely distinguished the two, as did the federal government. But an avalanche of subsequent rulings have come down on either side of the issue, showing that such a distinction is not easily made.
July 23, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS