Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has refused to review en banc a ruling against the University of Rochester in its patent battle over rights to a multibillion-dollar painkiller. But Friday's 7 to 5 decision -- which sparked three written dissents -- revealed a sharp divide that lawyers said requires action by the U.S. Supreme Court. At issue is whether a patent can be held invalid if it fails to provide a �written description� of the invention.
July 07, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS