Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Click here for the full text of this decision FACTS:Ann Fernandez filed multiple bills of review to reopen the estates of John G. Kenedy Jr. his sister and his wife, who died in 1948, 1961 and 1984, respectively. Fernandez says she is the biological child of Kenedy, a fact she just recently learned. A statutory probate court judge consolidated four bills of review pending in the county court for Kenedy County into one cause. He also ordered the bills of review pending in a Nueces County district court transferred to his court and consolidated. The attorney general’s office joined in a motion, filed by the John G. & Marie Stella Memorial Foundation, to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Fernandez then filed a motion to transfer and consolidate two bills of review filed in the district court of Kenedy County. A charitable trust in Kenedy’s name filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which the AG joined. The statutory probate court judge denied the motions of the trust/foundation/AG. He also granted Fernandez’s motion to transfer the district court cases. The AG appeals, arguing that the bills of review should have remained where they originated. HOLDING:Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. When the motion to dismiss and the plea to the jurisdiction were filed by the foundation and trust, and joined by the AG, the bills of review in the district court were not yet pending before the statutory probate court judge. In fact, the transfer of these two cases was not ordered until the day the judge ruled on the motion to dismiss and the plea to the jurisdiction. Thus, the AG sought a remedy with respect to those causes that the statutory probate court judge could not provide at the time. “Notably, on appeal, [the AG] does not seek dismissal of the three bills of review. Rather, the crux of [the AG's] arguments is that the three transferred bills of review should have remained in the district courts in which each was originally filed. [The AG] seeks a determination that the orders transferring these three actions were void. In effect, [the AG] is attempting to appeal from the orders transferring the three bills of review pursuant to section 5B of the probate code, not from rulings on pleas to the jurisdiction. Because we do not have statutory authority to consider an interlocutory appeal from a transfer order, we do not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal.” OPINION:Valdez, C.J.; Valdez, C.J., Hinojosa and Castillo, JJ. Castillo, J., concurs and dissents.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.