Decanting a controversy that could upset the tight state regulation of wine and alcoholic beverage sales nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider the constitutionality of state laws that restrict interstate shipment of wine to consumers. The court granted review in a trio of cases that present conflicting lower court decisions involving restrictive laws from Michigan and New York.
May 25, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
WASHINGTON — Decanting a controversy that could upset the tight state regulation of wine and alcoholic beverage sales nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider the constitutionality of state laws that restrict interstate shipment of wine to consumers.
The court granted review in a trio of cases that present conflicting lower court decisions involving restrictive laws from Michigan and New York.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
