Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A federal jury made the rout of Larry Silverstein almost complete when it ruled for the largest insurer in the dispute over insurance payments for the World Trade Center.

Foiling Silverstein’s bid to collect double the $877.5 million in insurance admittedly owed by Swiss Re International Business Insurance Co., the jury found Monday that Swiss Re was bound by language in a temporary policy, issued before Sept. 11, 2001, that limited the terror attacks on the twin towers to one occurrence.

The verdict came five days after Silverstein lost on the same question to several other insurance companies.

As with Swiss Re, the same jury found last week that those insurers were bound to the language of a temporary policy known as the WilProp – the policy language used by Silverstein’s insurance brokers during negotiations on coverage during the summer of 2001.

Silverstein has been fighting since September 2001 to win rulings that the attacks were two separate occurrences and that the $3.5 billion admittedly owed by the insurers should be doubled to $7 billion.

But last week’s verdict ensured that $1.06 billion of the $3.5 billion would not be doubled, and Monday’s decision took that amount to almost $1.9 billion. The maximum amount that Silverstein could now recover, and he would have to defeat several insurance companies at a second trial to do it, is less than $5 billion.

Silverstein and lead attorney Herbert Wachtell of Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz have argued that compensation for two occurrences is critical to the rebuilding at ground zero.

On Monday, Wachtell proposed an August date for the second trial, where a jury will be asked to decide the meaning of the undefined, or ill-defined, word “occurrence” for several other insurance policies that were being negotiated when the towers were leveled.

Last week, Silverstein prevailed as to only three insurance companies that were found not bound by the WilProp form.

Those three companies, that admittedly owe $176 million, will be joined in the second trial by seven other companies that had already been determined not to be bound by WilProp.

Monday’s win did not come easy for Swiss Re attorneys Barry Ostrager and Mary Kay Vyskocil of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, who learned last week that the jury had spent almost five full days debating the issue only as to Swiss Re. Both attorneys credited the case put on by Wachtell, who they called a “formidable” adversary.

Jacques DuBois, president of Swiss Re American Holding Co., said his company had “held firm” in its belief that Silverstein had underinsured the property.

This article originally appeared in the New York Law Journal , a publication of American Lawyer Media.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.