Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
125 Years Ago April 1879: Jennie Smith and an accomplice, Covert Bennett, were standing trial in Hudson County for the murder of Smith’s husband when one of the jurors fell ill. The defense proposed empanelling a substitute but instead the judge held a venire de novo. The defense raised double jeopardy, insisting the accused were being tried twice for the same crime. The objection failed and they were convicted, though it was reversed on appeal due to an erroneous jury charge. 100 Years Ago March 1904: It took brakeman Ellis Williams 21 years to recover for injuries sustained when he was struck by a bridge while standing upon a Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad box car. He sued in 1882 and won a verdict of $4,900 but was nonsuited when an appellate court ruled that he had ridden the train enough to know that the bridge was not high enough to permit him to pass under while standing erect. Years of appeals, reversals and retrials followed. The sixth and final trial produced a $4,500 verdict. 75 Years Ago April 1929: A bill in the Legislature proposed that county clerks, registers and surrogates start photocopying deeds, mortgages and other papers and forsake the laborious process of copying by hand or by typewriter. The Director of Public Records objected, “for the reason that no photostat prints have proven to be durable.” 50 Years Ago April 1, 1954: Little Silver lawyer Harry Green told of his personal experience with McCarthyism. His client, a radar operator at Fort Monmouth, was suspended on unsubstantiated charges of being a communist sympathizer. He was reinstated, but Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s Permanent Committee on Investigations nevertheless subpoenaed the man and documents relating to the incident, on pain of indictment for contempt. The panel ignored Green’s protest that disclosure would breach security rules the man was sworn to obey. 25 Years Ago March 29, 1979: A national conference of legal ethics experts urged that enforcement of attorney ethical codes be turned over to a “non-bar-affiliated agency” that would include lay members. Existing mechanisms, they said, tended to create the impression that “lawyers care more about protecting their own interests than those of their clients.” A year earlier, New Jersey had established the Disciplinary Review Board, with three lay members.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.