Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The trial court did not err in holding mother responsible for the costs of child's transportation to visit father, where mother had relocated with the child to Germany and where requiring father to pay child's travel expenses would create an undue burden on father's right to see his child. Affirmed.
March 29, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS