X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46758 Justice James PLAINTIFF’S STORE overlooks a memorial park being built as a tribute to residents who died in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. In a newspaper advertisement identified as a “paid advertisement” and “personal opinion,” an artist designing a memorial in the park criticized a billboard on the store’s roof. Defendants artist and newspaper sought dismissal of plaintiff’s action – which alleged defamation and tortious interference with business relations – as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation or SLAPP suit. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, finding that it failed to allege that defendants acted with actual malice, a prerequisite to a SLAPP action. In addition to finding the advertisement – replete with hyperbole, rhetoric and melodrama – to be an nonactionable expression of pure opinion, the court noted that plaintiff obtained its permit to erect the billboard and failed to allege any business losses due to the advertisement.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.