X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46473 Judge McDermott DEFENDANT, CHARGED with drunken driving and leaving the scene of an accident, sought suppression of statements to police. Defendant was arrested at his home when a state trooper arrived to investigate claims that defendant struck a vehicle while leaving a tavern. The trooper arrived at defendant’s home after having had a phone conversation with defendant, whose identity and address were obtained through credit card information, during which defendant made an incriminating statement. The court denied suppression of defendant’s statement made during the phone conversation, rejecting his argument that the conversation with the state trooper was akin to a custodial interrogation. The court suppressed defendant’s other statements. Noting the trooper’s testimony that he knew that defendant had not stopped at other bars after leaving the accident scene, the court concluded that the trooper intended to arrest defendant, so that defendant needed to have been warned of his Miranda rights.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.