Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46421 Judge Bernstein IN AN action involving application of the excusable neglect doctrine to a late class proof of claim, representative plaintiff in a class action filed a class proof of claim approximately six weeks after the bar date. The court granted the debtors’ motion to expunge the claim as untimely, noting that the debtors had commenced their Chapter 11 case in August 2003 and mailed a bar date notice, fixed as Oct. 7, 2003, in early September 2003. Plaintiff’s complaint was not filed in the California District Court until Oct. 1, 2003, six days before the deadline. In addition, the debtors were not named as a party-defendant because of an automatic stay. The court added that under these circumstances, the class was an unknown when the bar date was procured and the bar date notice was mailed, and the debtors were not required to send the bar date notice to the class counsel. The excusable neglect analysis, therefore, focused on circumstances surrounding the individual creditor’s failure to file a timely proof of claim.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.