X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
San Francisco-Famed securities fraud litigator William Lerach agreed last week to lead giant pension fund CalPERS into a federal court in New York in hopes of waging war against the New York Stock Exchange. But his first skirmish will be with partners at the East Coast operation of his own firm, New York-based Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach. For the past six months, the firm has been in the process of splitting in two. [NLJ, Dec. 15.] Partners in New York have already staked their claim to represent the investors in a class action that alleges several Wall Street specialist banks skimmed money from trades between buyers and sellers. ‘Kramer vs. Kramer’ So Lerach’s entry makes it likely the firm’s two offices will battle each other for the lucrative role of lead counsel. “It’s going to be interesting to watch,” said David Rosenfeld, an associate at New York’s Cauley, Geller, Bowman & Rudman, which filed one of several complaints in the case, but is not seeking to represent the class. “We’re all waiting to see how this plays out.” The firm’s ongoing divorce is due in part to differences between its two highest-profile partners, New York’s Melvyn Weiss and San Diego’s Lerach. With their two offices about to face off over a suit that strikes at the core of the American financial markets, Kramer vs. Kramer could look like an amicable parting. Milberg’s New York office filed suit in October against the specialist firms on behalf of Generic Trading of Philadelphia, a day-trading operation. Relying heavily on a Wall Street Journal report that detailed a confidential Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, the complaint filed last week by CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, named the same firms but added the New York Stock Exchange as a defendant. A spokesman for Phil Angelides, California state treasurer and a CalPERS board member, said the timing of the state’s lawsuit was intended to meet a 60-day deadline triggered by the original suit for any other Wall Street investors seeking to become lead plaintiff. With that deadline met, Lerach is now in the same courtroom as his soon-to-be ex-partners. And with CalPERS as his client, he stands a chance of wrestling the case from them. A lawyer representing Generic Trading alongside Milberg’s New York partners said he was monitoring the situation and is concerned about the development. Others involved in the case believe Milberg’s New York office knew Lerach was coming, pointing out that in court papers the office refers to itself as “Milberg Weiss-NY,” perhaps to avoid confusing the judge. Attorneys for Milberg could not be reached for comment. So far, the two prospective lead plaintiffs have only filed motions arguing why they are best suited to serve as lead counsel. U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet is expected to award lead counsel status in mid-January. Opposition motions-which can sometimes get nasty, especially in high-profile securities fraud cases-are due in a few weeks. “That’s going to be an interesting filing,” Rosenfeld said. Difference in styles The East and West Coast offices of the 220-lawyer firm have long operated somewhat independently of each other. Lerach, based in San Diego, has led the West Coast offices, while Weiss, in New York, heads the East Coast. In June, Weiss said the firm had grown too large and the time had come to split in two. He also cited a difference in styles between himself and Lerach, who have reportedly had a close, but complicated, relationship over the years. “You have people litigating in their own styles,” Weiss said then, “and you want to have one approach.” There are signs that the divorce has been completed in spirit, if not on paper. East Coast and West Coast partners are already competing for clients, said a lawyer who did not wish to be named. Also, the New York office recently filed a securities fraud class action in San Francisco, leaving any mention of the firm’s San Francisco office off their filings. Andrew Longstreth, a reporter for The American Lawyer, a sister publication of the NLJ, contributed to this report.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.