Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A $521 million patent infringement verdict against Microsoft Corp. may have been the result of what jurors didn't hear, according to Microsoft's lawyers. The trial centered on technology that allows an Internet user to access interactive Web pages through the user's Web browser. A key argument of Microsoft's defense was that prior art pre-dated the plaintiff's research. According to the parties, Judge James Zagel issued a ruling saying the jury would not be asked to consider the question of prior art.
October 28, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS