X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Plaintiffs thwarted from suing state governments under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) may have discovered a chink in the states’ armor, thanks to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The ruling occurred in the cases of a breast cancer survivor and an asthma sufferer who, two years ago, lost a landmark disability rights case at the U.S. Supreme Court. Now they have found a new way to get their claims heard. A three-judge 11th Circuit panel last week revived the suits in which Patricia Garrett and Milton Ash allege that Alabama state agencies discriminated against them because they were disabled. The panel-Chief Judge J.L. Edmondson, Judge Edward E. Carnes and visiting U.S. District Judge Richard W. Story of the Northern District of Georgia-rejected Alabama’s arguments that had carried the day at the Supreme Court in 2001. Garrett claims that she was demoted from her job at the University of Alabama at Birmingham hospital because she was undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Ash, who suffers from asthma, claims that the state department of youth services failed to enforce its no-smoking policy. The pair had sued under the ADA, but the high court in 2001 ruled, 5-4, that Congress did not have the constitutional authority to subject state governments to ADA suits. The case, Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, drew a great deal of attention. A bipartisan group of lawmakers, plus former President George H.W. Bush, who, in 1990 signed the ADA, urged the Supreme Court to uphold the plaintiffs’ right to sue state agencies under the law. High court steps in But the Supreme Court majority, following recent precedents finding limits on congressional power, held that the 11th Amendment gave states immunity from this type of ADA suit. After more than two years of review in lower courts, the 11th Circuit panel ruled that the sovereign immunity that had protected Alabama from the ADA did not apply to a more obscure law, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Along with claiming ADA violations, Garrett, Ash and a third plaintiff, Joseph Stephenson, also brought their suits under the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits agencies that receive federal funds from excluding handicapped people from participating in the agencies’ programs. Edmondson, Carnes and Story issued a relatively simple, 11-page, unsigned decision. They pointed out that Congress passed a law stating specifically that state agencies that accept federal funds were not entitled to 11th Amendment immunity from violations of the Rehabilitation Act. The same rule applies to the laws popularly known as Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded schools; Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits race discrimination; and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, according to the 11th Circuit decision, Garrett v. Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees, No. 02-16078 (11th Cir. Sept. 11, 2003).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.