finding that the admission of a defendant's police-interview statements in a trial helped convict her of murder, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court stated on Aug. 6 that the woman's statements should have been suppressed because she made them in police custody and had not been given the Miranda warning. State v. Bridges, No. Was-02-38.
August 18, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Harter Secrest and Emery is seeking a securities and capital markets attorney, senior associate or counsel level, with eight or more years o...
Are you a talented Estate Litigation Attorney looking to join a dynamic, full-service law firm with a focus on growth and collaboration? Her...
