X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=39448 IN A COMMERCIAL non-payment action, petitioner landlord sought $90,000 for additional rent, late fees and interest and additional security deposit. A lease provision defined “additional rent.” Respondent’s principal claimed that, based on an unexecuted lease amendment, he had paid a reduced rental amount from April 2001 through June 2002. He also testified that rent invoices were devoid of any late fees or interest charges. Finding that pursuant to the statute of frauds the lease could not be modified by the unexecuted amendment, the court awarded petitioner $14,877. It found that petitioner had improperly calculated late fees and had not applied interest charges against each month’s balance. Upon recalculation and application of a $31,900 payment by respondent, the court determined that petitioner was owed $377 in late fees and interest. The court also found that under the lease, petitioner was entitled to a $14,500 security deposit.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.