Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The trial court properly concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over the appellant's claims to the extent that they are based on the insurance company's delay in reimbursing expenses for, or preauthorizing, medical care other than the psychotherapy ordered by the TWCC. However, the trial court erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction over the appellant's claims to the extent they are based on the company's denial of preauthorization for the TWCC-ordered psychotherapy treatment.
May 12, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS