Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
special to the national law journal Four months after being fired from his $650,000-a-year job as vice president and controller for Enterprise Rent-a-Car, Thomas Dunn in the spring of 2001 sued the company, claiming that he had been axed in retaliation for reporting what he believed to be illegal activities there. On April 11, a St. Louis jury agreed with Dunn, finding that Enterprise had unlawfully fired him and awarded $4,000,000 in compensatory damages. Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Co., No. 01CC-001530 (St. Louis Co., Mo., Cir. Ct.). According to one of Dunn’s lawyers, Matthew Ghio of St. Louis’ Van Amburg, Chackes, Carlson & Spritzer, Enterprise fired Dunn because he would not commit illegal acts pertaining to a planned initial public offering (IPO) by the company. “Essentially, they wanted him to cook the books on an IPO,” Ghio said. But the jury was never allowed to decide that issue. Trial Judge Jack Koehr directed a verdict for Enterprise on the accounting issue, leaving the jury to decide only whether Enterprise fired Dunn for whistleblowing about other company business practices. Ghio said he believes Koehr erred in throwing out the accounting claim. “The law doesn’t have to actually be broken. The point is whether he was ever pressured to break the law,” he said. Although Enterprise has said it will appeal, Dunn has not decided whether to appeal the directed verdict on the accounting claims. Michael Kahn of San Francisco’s Folger Levin & Kahn, one of Enterprise’s lawyers, said the verdict was a win for the defense. “Their final settlement demand was many times $4 million,” he said, adding, “They had an expert claim $65 million in compensatory damages alone-this case was about much more than $4 million.” Kahn noted that, upon Dunn’s discharge, Enterprise offered him $1 million. “After he pays his lawyers and expenses, he’ll be getting about what we offered him when he left.” Kahn added that they were able to inform the jury of Enterprise’s $1 million dollar settlement offer. “This verdict is about the jury saying, ‘OK, we’ll give the guy his million dollars and pay his lawyers and expenses,’ ” Kahn said. “ This verdict was a repudiation of the plaintiff’s case.” Horrigan’s e-mail address is

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.