Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The California Supreme Court thrilled rights activists Thursday by announcing that it plans to conduct further study on a proposal to prevent the state’s judges from belonging to groups — such as the Boy Scouts of America — that discriminate against gays. In a short statement, the high court said that during Wednesday’s weekly administrative conference, the seven justices “discussed at length” proposals submitted by groups such as the Bar Association of San Francisco and the Los Angeles County Bar Association. “The court had an extensive discussion about this matter,” Chief Justice Ronald George said in the statement, “and has decided to take up the matter at a future administrative conference after it undertakes a further study of the proposals.” In recent months, former BASF President Angela Bradstreet had beaten the drum for changes in the state’s judicial canons to make it clear whether judges could belong to the Boy Scouts. While the ethics canons clearly prohibit participation in discriminatory groups, they make an exception for “nonprofit youth organizations” such as the Boy Scouts. San Francisco’s judges voted recently to distance themselves from such groups, and the Santa Clara County Bar Association has sided with BASF. Last week, the L.A. County bar sent a letter to George asking specifically that the exemption for youth organizations be lifted, coinciding to the day that Bradstreet, BASF Executive Director Teveia Barnes and current BASF President Jeffrey Bleich were meeting with the chief justice. On Thursday, Barnes called the court’s announcement “wonderful news. The fact that the court took the step to review it at least sends a message to [members of] the gay and lesbian community that they are valued.” Bleich, who became president Dec. 13, said Thursday that the court’s decision “reflects the fact that the Supreme Court appreciates the importance of this issue, particularly the importance of having litigants before the courts worrying about the appearance of fairness.” Miriam Krinsky, president of the L.A. County bar, called the announcement a “positive step.” “Recent events, including actions of two county bar associations to adopt different policies, and the Judicial Council’s report reflecting significant perceptions of bias,” she said, “suggest that this is an issue that warrants the court’s consideration anew.” Supreme Court spokeswoman Lynn Holton said the Supreme Court itself would be studying the issue. “They are not at this time,” she said, “directing it to any outside group.” Activists’ impetus for change comes from the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2000 ruling in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640, which said the group has a constitutional right to discriminate based on sexual orientation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.