Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

You are attending a partners meeting, listening as candidates for admission to partnership are being presented. “Our next candidate recorded 3,000 billable hours and has an effective rate of $1,000 per hour, plus a generated book of business worth $3,000,000 — and keeps a herd of other associates working their hearts out.” How do you vote? In most firms, the answer is a no-brainer: That candidate would be made a partner. The punch line is that, even with those remarkable numbers, he or she might be inappropriate for partnership admission. Which firms would know this? Which would have the courage to say no? When it comes to tapping new partners, the boom of the 1990s led many firms into temptation. Work was flying in the door and firms compromised, promoting people who would not have passed the threshold in normal times. But firms had excuses: The busiest partners needed help, and lesser competitors were bribing the best candidates to join other firms, so they had no choice. Now it is time for course corrections. Courageous corrections. This article is not about culling the herd; it’s about making partnership decisions for the long haul. First, we must slay the seven demons called “Yes, but . . .” You will recognize the “Yes, but . . .” demons in the following utterances: • Yes, but she is such a good lawyer. • Yes, but he is so smart. • Yes, but she bills a lot of money. • Yes, but clients love him. • Yes, but she has such a large book of business. • Yes, but he attracts so many new clients. • Yes, but she is one of the foremost experts in a challenging field. Please note that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with any of these statements. They are demons because the “Yes, but . . .” suggests that we accept sins along with the positives, and that is the fatal mistake. If “Yes, but . . .” is allowed to rule the day, partnership decisions will not be defined by internal guidelines or policies or values — or anything else, really — just the brute force of a short-term, strip-mining mentality. If that is what firm leaders want, fine, but don’t pretend to have admission criteria. IN THE YEAR 2020

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.